Sunday, December 4, 2011

A Modest Blog

     Unemployment went down last month, but that's probably because many people have just stopped looking for work and aren't even counted anymore. Lots of college graduates are moving back in with relatives because they can't afford their own space, but Chevron-Texaco made profit in excess of $10 billion last year. We have the Occupy protests to voice our outrage to the world. Well, that was the case until police have cracked down in recent weeks, displacing many demonstrators. So things seem pretty grim. Yet, we have a pretty charmed existence compared to 1700's Ireland. Rich manipulating the poor, economic strife, and hunger surrounded common people everyday. Ill advised solutions to these problems were running rampant and it seemed there was no rational voice for change. It is in this environment that Jonathan Swift wrote A Modest Proposal.

     This work makes the modest proposal that to earn money, the poor should sell their children to be eaten by the rich. The rich eat well and the poor are not hassled with the responsibility of feeding their offspring. The satire works here because at once it both lampoons ineffective action on Ireland's problems and reveals the seriousness of the subject through exaggeration. A morbid sense of humor catches the reader's attention and sheds light on the problems facing the poor. It works in the same way a Colbert Report segment does in modern times. Colbert's ultra-conservative character will propose outrageously exaggerated suggested action on a particular topic. We laugh because we see how ridiculous the right can be and we stop to think because we see that the situations presented are often close to reality.
 
     Works like A Modest Proposal may not lead directly to change, but they often wake people up and make them confront current circumstances. That's what we need now more then ever: people to wake up from their media-induced slumber.

Works Cited
Swift, Jonathan. "A Modest Proposal." (1729): n. page. Web. 4 Dec. 2011. <http://emotionalliteracyeducation.com/classic_books_online/mdprp10.htm>.

Sunday, November 13, 2011

The Interview

  I conducted this interview with my roommate Greg. He is twenty-four years old and has been playing shooters for twelve years. This is a clip of one of those games.


What kinds of shooters do you play?

I play a lot of video games and only some of those are shooters. Halo, Timesplitters, and Team Fortress 2 are some of my favorite first person shooters. However, there are games like the Grand Theft Auto series, where shooting is involved, but it isn't the whole scope of the game.


How do these games depict violence?

It varies from game to game. In some, you're killing aliens so it isn't very realistic to begin with. In others, the game is cartoonish, so the depiction of violence follows suit. Sometimes killing is something you have to do to complete and objective: kill this guy, take this point. To be honest, in hectic multiplayer games you're moving so fast that you don't really have time to stop and notice to what extent they show blood or gore. You just shoot someone and move on.

Describe the way you feel when you get a kill or shoot someone in these games.

If it's a multiplayer game you feel good, because you've just tested your skills against another person and passed. There's no remorse or time to feel bad because that's the point of the game: to kill. But take a game with a well crafted storyline and it can actually be quite emotional when a character dies or you're forced to kill someone.

Do you think violent FPS games have an impact on the way people see similar acts in the real world?

Maybe if you're a moron. I've been playing so called "violent" games since I was 12 and I'm not desensitized to images of gore or brutality. In fact, I think these games are helpful as an outlet for stress and anger.


*On that note, we watched the following clip*



What kinds of things go through your mind when watching a clip like this?

This is awful. How could you watch a clip like this and not be moved? Obviously, when someone sees this their first instinct is to wish they could have done something to help or stop this kind of thing. The hard part is to know you can't and use the knowledge you gain by watching to change things that may happen in the future.

Compare the things you see here with what you see when you play a typical game.

Obviously the game companies want to make something fun to play and realistic to a point. No one wants to play a game where your soldier loses a limb and has to battle the VA paperwork to get health benefits. Does this mean they gloss over the real impact of war and violence Yes. Doe that make them irresponsible? No. It's entertainment. It should be up to our politicians and our newscasters to show us the real face of these things, yet they fail us daily.

Would you change anything about games you play? Will you continue to play these games?

I wouldn't change anything about the games and I will continue to play. If anything, it would be nice if everyone who plays them was educated enough to know the difference between what they see on the screen and the true destructive force of violence in the real world.

Where do you think violence in video games is headed?

It seems to be going in both directions. There are games coming out where the blood and gore is over the top and fans can't get enough. But, there are companies out there who don't have to use violence to make a good game. Believe it or not, despite what politicians want you to believe, not all video games are hyper-violent bloodfests.  

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Regarding the Pain of Occupy Protesters

     We're discussing pain, what it means to photograph pain, and what seeing others in pain can accomplish. The Occupy protests are the embodiment of all of these ideas. The protests are pain. They are the manifestation of the pain felt by many from an unjust system. There is a sense of sadness and loss created by the knowledge that such potential will be wasted to muddled goals and overwhelming capitalist dominance. With new technology, we see more photographs of people in pain than we would have in the past. "In an era of information overload, the photograph provides a quick way of apprehending" complicated situations like the Occupy protests (Sontag 22).  In Oakland, this is more evident than anywhere else as police crack down. What can these images accomplish?
     Consider this image, with the caption 'Police arrest protesters who refused to disperse near City Hall in Oakland, California early November 3, 2011. A general strike called by Occupy Oakland shut down the port'.
     That is exactly what we see: police in riot gear arresting a man, his mouth bloody from some unknown action. His mouth is open, looking as if he is calling out to anyone nearby, perhaps someone out of frame. Yet, it is hard not to imagine he is calling out to the viewer at home. The photo comes to us from the United Press International website. In the past, UPI was a large player in the news game with trusted names like Helen Thomas in their ranks. Today, UPI has fallen on hard times and is now owned by News World Communications. In ways, this is similar to our once great nation, reduced to a shell of its former self. Still, there may be hope yet for both United Press International and the United States of America.  UPI has found a niche market and somewhat distinct flavor, influenced by ownership interests outside of the United States. America, on the other hand, has the Occupy protests.
     To a supporter of the Occupy protests, photographs such as this one tell the whole story. The eye is drawn to the men and women of law enforcement, a part of the 99%. Instead of joining the movement, they are deployed in their riot gear, looking more like something out of a third world conflict than peace keepers in an American city. They stand all powerful over the protester, as the interests they serve stand all powerful over the American public. To a supporter, the overwhelming use of force shown in this photo and on occasional news stories is a sign that their cause is just. All of this and no one has even mentioned the pictures of Scott Olsen, which tell the same tale in more graphic and vivid detail.
     To those opposed to the Occupy demonstrations, photographs such as this one tell the whole story. If the photo could inspire some to feel compassion, "surely they would also foster greater militancy on behalf of" those who are content with the status quo (Sontag 18). These are troublemakers, working hard to bring down everything we hold dear. They are lazy beatniks, having nothing better to do than incite violence. We see young people and minorities, people who usually sit on the sidelines and the people who are marginalized by the mass media. The opposition never sees images of these groups and when they finally do, it is in a negative light. They are being arrested or breaking shop windows. To the anti-Occupy forces, this is a dangerous man being arrested and put where he belongs.
     On photo, two interpretations. Still images have the power to hold so many meanings at once. They have the amazing ability to persist. The only question is which view will stand the test of time and make it to the history books.

Works Cited

Sontag, Susan. Regarding the Pain of Others. Picador USA, 2005. Print.
    

Sunday, October 23, 2011

Home Improvement

     As I was looking at all of the information on Fractracker.org, some things stood out. The image gallery really grabs your attention and makes it hard to ignore what hydraulic fracturing is doing to communities around the country. Facts, data, reports, or research studies are fine, but people cling to images. Pictures capture scenes that are hard to express with words alone.
       The fracking process rips into the ground, tears apart rock formations, and blasts harmful chemicals into the void. A similar process is mirrored above ground. The drilling teams rip apart forests, tear apart serene wilderness, and spread harmful chemicals across acres of a drilling site. This is natural beauty destroyed by human intervention. Theses are large swaths of pristine forest we should preserve for future generations, ravaged by the pursuit of profits.Why should we stand up to stop this now? Fracking joins capitalism as something that "destroys your water, your air, and your food" (Seitz).  Capitalism has done the same thing to the country for our entire lives. The system in place won't stop until the top 1% holds 100% of the wealth. Here we can sleep easy, because fracking will stop just as soon as the natural gas is gone and your community is unlivable. Chesapeake Energy will leave the land once it is of no use to anyone or anything. But don't worry. Here is their plan to make it all better.
       They'll reduce the zone of devastation above ground to a measly acre. They'll make the area pretty by putting dirt back and making roads better than before. This is to mention nothing of the long term impact to groundwater and all of the chemicals left underground.
     They aren't the only gigantic corporation to step up and try to make us feel good as they obliterate the environment. Exxon Mobil is an ever-present figure in the fracking game. Any search of hydraulic fracturing on YouTube is greeted by Exxon videos at the top and bottom of the results. Take a look at the rest of their video library and things get disturbing. Many of the pro-Marcellus Shale exploration videos claim the energy found here will release us of our dependence on "foreign oil". Foreign, in this instance, is always evil. It always seems to imply the money we spend on oil imports goes directly to the pockets of terrorists and radicals. Maybe it goes to Canadian terrorists and radicals. Canada is our top supplier of oil after all. This mad grab for energy at any cost is global too. The Exxon YouTube page has videos in other languages, targeting potential victims across the globe. Of course, no hydraulic fracturing commercial would be complete without mentioning our current economic situation. Don't fret, the same large corporations,bankers, and wealthy elites who helped ruin the economy will now save us with their divine mercy.  Never fear. We wrecked your financial system, but you can have a few jobs back as long as you don't mind destroying your environment and community. A few of you can get off of unemployment if you give us "a five-year option to drill among the headstones of the faithful departed" (Seitz).
     Who will save us? Chomsky shows us that these important issues will never make it into the media's agenda. There are small, local efforts to educate people about fracking, but raise your hand if you listen to The Allegheny Front or watch fracking documentaries. Wait. Governor Corbett is stepping up to fight for us.
     Maybe this was an elaborate joke of some kind by Mr. Corbett. It is quite funny. He starts by telling us that drilling for natural gas impacts communities and the area around the sites. He knows, he's been there. Yet, instead of mentioning one single chemical people are exposed to in this process or raising one single environmental concern, he manages to make "impact" into a good thing. The drilling sites impact the area, but it's only an increase in school attendance because of all the glorious jobs fracking provides. Move over Tim Allen, Tom Corbett is now the funniest man in America. Maybe he isn't funny. He's just really good at his job: serving the interests of the myriad of energy companies who, in one way or another, gave his campaign massive sums of money.

Works Cited

Seitz, Daivd. "The Sacred and the Propane." Explosion Proof. 01 Jan 2011:11-14. Print.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

If No News Is Good News, Then WPXI Is Great!

Viewing Log:

WPXI
Saturday October 15, 2011
11:00 PM to 11:30 PM

Top Story-- Occupy Pittsburgh (3:30)
  • Reporter in field
  • "Man-on-street" interviews (how are theses people selected?)
  • Highlights good of capitalism
Collections for slain officer
  • Tribute to officer
  • Field reporter again
  • Quick cuts (constant change, short attention span?)
  • Community coming together, police force is "good"
"Breaking News" (:20)
  • House fire (does this count as breaking?)
Severe Weather
  • Wind damage
  • More quick cuts
  • How severe is this?
  • Trying desperately to make this a story
Severe Weather Center 11
  • Wind speeds
  • Always called severe weather center, makes it sound more important
  • Temperatures
  • Forecast
New at 11
  • Man in hospital after shooting
  • Person thrown from car
  • Apartment fire
  • These get a few seconds of airtime each (few sentences at most)
  • How is this helpful? Why not say more about fewer topics?
Black and Gold Zone (:30)
  • Stats
  • Player Interviews
  • In-show plug for another WPXI show
Stimulus Money
  • Spent Overseas
  • Yet another story reduced to a few sentences
Commercial Break #1
  • Sears
  • Huntington
  • Trane
  • Chrystler/Dodge
  • How do these company's fit here? Who are they trying to reach?
Construction Projects
  • Lane Restrictions
Hit and Run (:10)

*Logo and music played throughout ("News Coverage You Can Count On")*

Occupy Pittsburgh-- Again
  • This segment seems to praise companies for not taking action against protesters
Man Organizes Own Protest
  • Socialism and its role in country
Occupy Wall Street

Severe Weather Team Forecast
  • Wind-- Again
  • Wind speeds-- Again
  • Forecast for night-- Again
  • Hour by Hour forecast
  • *this is more in depth than almost any other segment*
  • Game forecast
  • *One of the longest segments too*
  • Timeline
  • 5 Day forecast
Commercial Break #2
  • Judge Judy
  • Sheetz
  • Toyota
  • WPXI Weather commercial
Bethel Park Teacher's Union

Sports (3:30)
  • Penguins lose
  • Detailed highlights
  • Player's talk
  • Pitt's season
  • Todd Graham and players talk
  • Penn State Highlight
Black and Gold Zone-- Again
  • Players speak
Commercial Break #3
  • Highmark
  • Jeep
  • IUP
  • Highmark-- Again
Bridge Jump

END


     We talked in class about the fact that people know very little about the world around them. We took a quiz and people could describe Kim Kardashian's wedding, but they could not identify the governor of Pennsylvania. I thought that this was the result of living in a society full of morons. While that is still true, I now see that there are other factors at work. If a person wanted to learn more about the world, one of the first places they would turn would be to the local news. Indeed, many people still tune into local newscasts as their primary source of information about their city, state, or country. No thought could be scarier after just one viewing of WPXI's 11:00 PM broadcast.
     The viewer is greeted by the theme music and logos that explain that this is "News Coverage You Can Count On". This is in stark contrast to often frightening story lines emphasized by the news. The world is an awful place, but sit down in the comfort of your home with our trusted news team and we'll tell you all about it. You can count on us. The top story of the night is your only hope for any depth of coverage, but even this barely qualifies as an overview. Tonight, we are treated to news on Occupy Pittsburgh, protests against Wall Street, and frustration with the economy as a whole. WPXI's field reporter describes the protests as the audience watches quick cuts between action shots. Then there are interviews with the average person on the street. Mind you, these people are chosen by the news team and their comments are cleared before they make it on the air. WPXI manages to find a person at the rally who is quick to state that the movement is "pleased with capitalism as a whole". How convenient. WPXI is an NBC affiliate. NBC is a huge conglomerate owned by GE. How convenient that a news program owned by a huge corporation would find ways to praise the system that allows huge companies to assume such power. In fact, the whole half hour played like a long commercial: no substance, selling other WPXI programs, and very brief. It would be hard to learn anything other than "buy, buy, buy" from stories so brief. Sports coverage clocked in at three minutes and thirty seconds, plus other sports related stories mentioned outside of the true sports segment. Weather had not one, but two segments devoted to its content. Sports and weather must make us better citizens. Sports and weather must allow us to be more involved in our community. Want to hear more about the teachers' union negotiations in Bethel Park? Good luck catching the few sentences devoted to that topic. In the span of thirty seconds or less, the anchor read a list of stories that included a shooting, a person being thrown from a car, and an apartment fire. That's about ten seconds per story. Ten seconds. That's enough time to scare someone, but not enough to inform them to any degree. NPR might devote five minutes or more to one story. The PBS series Frontline uses an entire hour to cover stories in depth. If Noam Chomsky and the Manufacturing Consent documentary dealt with oversimplification in mass media and other problem of the sort, they have an excellent example in WPXI's news at 11.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Puppies Sitting In A Wagon

     There is no escaping the "ad clutter", not anymore. As a society, as a culture, we have moved to a place of constant connection. With smart phones, tablet computers, and other new technology we can be reached anywhere, anytime. This means advertisers can reach us at all times as well. New tech joins a long list of old techniques companies have used to sell us things we don't need. As I sit in my room, there are not too many ads to be counted, just a few shoe logos and the like. Oh, wait! What's this? A computer and a television set, you say? Through the Interweb and cable television, we invite advertisements into our homes. Want to watch the local news? Well, here are seven ads for things to make you beautiful. Want to reach a website with information about your favorite European sporting club? Well, here are six ads for products to make you fit in. You can't even watch a Youtube clip without being forced to sit through the covertly racist and sexist ads from corporate America. No one is safe. This is where we come to the puppies and their wagon.
 They may look safe in there, but advertisers are going after your dog next, since humans have learned to ignore the "ad clutter" the best they can. Beneful, the dog food company, has designed an ad aimed directly at Fido. It uses high pitched tones only dogs can hear. You see Spot flipping out when the commercial comes on, assume he/she wants the Beneful, and buy it without thinking. All of this is a step on the road to a company's ultimate goal. They want "loyalty without thinking", as we saw in the video shown in class. Shocking. They use studies of cult behavior to improve their techniques. Even more shocking and hard to stomach.
     What is the end-point here? Does power ever swing back to the consumer/citizen? Will anything be done to stop this war on the public? No, probably not. Not as long as people continue to buy in a zombie-like trance. Not as long as we allow Facebook, Google, and thousands of other entities to collect, sell and distribute our personal information as they see fit. Then they spit it back at us in the form of ads for the latest hip products. There is no escaping the "add clutter", not anymore.
 
     

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Sex Sells and So Does Sexism

     Here is an advertisement that won't really cause much of a stir with most people who view it.

     Look! There is another sexy woman used to sell a product. Does it really even matter what the product is anymore? It seems as though advertisers will use sex to get us to buy anything. Yet, this ad is sending other messages too. The man's stance is one of power and dominance over the helpless damsel. The man is fully dressed in a suit, which indicates that he is successful in business or his chosen profession. The ad for vodka eliminates any value the woman may have had. It depicts a powerful man providing alcohol for a lazy woman with nothing better to do than sit around on a nameless, sun-drenched beach. This message is harmful to those who view it. We begin to see this image as normal. Man towers over woman, because this ad and countless others like it proclaim it to be so. The public is fed and becomes used to this scenario because a "complex set of interlocking enterprises that have disproportionate" amounts of money and power display it as truth (West). Huge corporations tell the masses how to feel and how to think over time through advertisements and other media messages so subtle we cannot resist them.
     Here is an advertisement that would cause even less of a stir.
      This man is paraded around to sell a product, with his body shown as his only asset of any worth. The same rules apply in this case. This degrades the value of men. Such advertisements put this image of what it means to be a man in the minds of unsuspecting people. Suddenly, every man is expected to have sculpted abs, buff biceps, and a sultry look on his face. It is important that we talk about mass media issues that impact various groups in the world. We need to discuss the plight of women, racial minorities or anyone else done a disservice by multinational corporations who control institutions too numerous to count. Still, I fear that sometimes these conversations do more to divide us than anything else. Don't the "waters of despair and dread that now flood down the streets of black America" also lap the doorsteps of other groups (West)? We are all human beings, and while our struggles are all different in ways, we all feel the pains of life. We should stand united against the institutions that surely stand united against us. Every human being is a target of their greed and manipulation. The more we squabble about what makes us different, the more ineffective we become against their advances. 

Works Cited:

West, Cornel. Race Matters. Beacon Pr, 2001. Web.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Who Needs A Girlfriend When You Have The Food Network?

     This is going to be very difficult. I have never see pornography, so I'm not sure what to look for and identify in "food porn". So, I asked some friends and did extensive Internet research to make sure my observations would be more accurate. Let's start with a program on The Food Network.


Now, I have never cooked anything more advanced than Beefaroni, but I have watched Giada De Laurentiis on her various television shows. Do I plan on making any of the food created on the programs? No. Yet, I keep coming back. Giada begins many episodes of her flagship program in a relaxed location. She may be sitting in her living room, sending me a personal invitation to join her in the kitchen or she could be strolling along the beach in her bikini, telling me of a new exotic food hideaway. These introductions seem to be meant "to appeal to a sense of yearning", like many early works about sex (Bourdain). How could one resist? There are no ugly female chefs on The Food Network. They are stunning or old, and that doesn't count. Giada certainly is attractive ands her outfits always seem to reveal just enough without revealing too much. Just read the titles and comments on her Youtube videos to see how people feel about her show. Factor in the quick, sexy cut-away shots of fresh food and sensual reactions to taste tests and you can see why Giada's shows, and many on the channel, may fall short making master chefs of the public, "but as entertainment, it may just tide you over" (Patterson).
     If there was an election held for "food porn" president, Denny's would have to get more than a few votes. Take this commercial for their Baconalia event as an example.

 Listen to the announcer. His moans and groans sound more as if they belong in the bedroom than in the kitchen. The bacon here "isn't erotic, just unreal" (Patterson). In the same way traditional pornography creates a false picture of sexual encounters, Denny's creates an unrealistic depiction of food. Bacon sundaes are not typical foods and four-ways are not typical sexual acts. The creators of such television commercials and network programming are quite clever in there approach. Why not appeal to one of the things that drives us as human beings: sexual desires. Suddenly, we aren't thinking clearly. We need this bacon stuffed sandwich, stuffed with bacon. We may not know why, but or interest is peaked by a Giada De Laurentiis show and we watch through all of the commercials for Ford trucks and Pepsi Cola. Show us the sizzling bacon. Show us the fresh, bite size baby bell peppers stuffed with lord knows what. Show me those "beautiful objects arranged in ways one might never have previously considered" (Bourdain). Who's hungry?

Works Cited:

Bourdain, Anthony. "Food Porn: Lust for the gastronomic -From Zola to cookbooks- is nothing new, but maybe it's time to shelve it". 04 Nov 2001. n. pg. SF Gate. Web. 24 Sept 2011.

Patterson, Troy. "Oral Pleasures: The Food Network gets dirty with Nigella Feasts and Paula's Party". Slate. 5 Oct 2006: n. page. Web. 24 Sept 2011. <http://www.slate.com/id/2151036/>.








Sunday, September 18, 2011

"Cool" Hunters? More Like Fool Hunters.

     When I was in high school, anyone who was anyone was into ABBA. But then I realized that they were totally lame. So, I got with what was really cool: Legos and deep dish pizza. I'm not sure what will be cool in 5 years, however I am sure it will be totally awesome and I'll be right there with the latest trends.


     I was going to start my post with something just like you see above, but then I came to the conclusion that that would be totally useless. Was anyone else disgusted by the video we watched in class? I found the fact that some morons have made a living off of claiming to capture some made-up "cool" and selling it to even bigger morons employed by large corporations funny, infuriating, and tragic. What those companies buy, what they ship out to our television screens, and what we consume with such passion is anything but cool. What a subjective and useless term. "Cool" is simply a person's individual tastes. When people sell an image of "cool", they are trying to force the public to like the same things. Sadly, many people fall into this trap. Just because someone likes something different than you, does that make them "uncool"? The "cool" hunters only find things that small groups like. That doesn't make it "cool". Yet, it is sad when they sell what they find to a large audience. The "cool" doesn't die, but genuine art or expression are often brutally murdered. Let us take a look at the case of the next big thing in music. Somewhere right now a band is playing their music in front of a small group of dedicated fans. The artist is expressing truth and emotion, which the audience relates to their own experiences, and a good time is had by all. Soon, other bands adopt similar styles, more people join the fan-base, and a scene is formed. This is the point in the story where our "cool" hunters come to the rescue. They sell this new scene to the corporate set. The company's rip out all of the soul and sell us the lifeless body. You and I buy the albums and we all live happily, mindlessly ever after.      

Saturday, September 10, 2011

I Saw Madagascar In Theatres, So I'm Pretty Sure I Know All About Conditions In Sub-Saharan Africa

     We watch television shows with characters young and old. We watch movies that depict people of many different races, religions, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Yes, we consume massive amounts of media that show us all kinds of human beings. Do any of them accurately or adequately reflect me or my community? Even though I see movies with characters who are in similar circumstances to those I find myself in, they are not me. I may read a novel with a character who shares some of my personality traits, but we aren't identical. We are all complex individuals, shaped through all the years of our lives by our own unique set of experiences. No form of media produced by others could ever fully capture that. So then, isn't it dangerous when people rely on "systems of communication that are not subordinated to the sovereignty of territory" to form judgements and perspectives (Seitz, 2010)?
     Television, advertisements, and other types of media are hard to resist. They move, unimpeded as shadows, into our homes, our countries, and our lives in ways that nothing else does. Even if we choose to reject media messages we disagree with, it is unlikely that those around us will do the same. So, if a book paints a negative picture of your age group or your culture, what does that mean for the readers of that book? If you read a magazine article about someone who looks like me, does that mean you know more about me? Unfortunately, so many of us get our information on other cultures or groups from media that does a very poor job of showing the many sides of a subject. With mass media, we see the "overwhelming ability that faceless, transnational corporations possess to alter cultures and shape global perceptions of groups (Seitz, 2010).
     We must completely reject the world view spoon fed to us by the media. I cannot count on mass media to accurately or adequately depict me. We must get to know people, not music videos. You must talk with someone and find out who they really are. Communities must come together to forge their own identity.
     Now, if I was forced to choose one piece of media that best portrayed who I am, it would be the clip below. Like Rambo, I am a man who must cover himself in mud to hide from, and subsequently kill, his enemies.



 Works Cited:
Seitz, D. (2010). Cultural Identity In the Age of Ether: Black Entertainment Television and the Island of Guadeloupe. 425-442.





     

Saturday, September 3, 2011

The Media We Deserve

     It has been said many times that in the United States, we get the government we deserve. I believe the same can be said for media. Why are television shows that have no intellectual value always the most popular? Why does no one know of important events in the U.S. and around the world? Simply, mass media is brainless because he American public, as a whole, is brainless. Nothing of worth is brought to traditional forms of mass media due to the fact that there is no audience for such things. A source that brought about insightful news programming, thought provoking works of fiction or complex entertainment would soon find itself out of business or speaking to a scant few. Large audiences "are more interested in themselves than anything else in the world" (Lippmann). Perhaps this would explain why most would rather post what they had for breakfast on Facebook than seek information on America's use of predator drones in far flung foreign lands. Yet, couldn't it be said that powerful interests wish to keep the public ignorant of the real state of the world? Wouldn't mass media be the perfect tool to pacify us? While both of these are true, I feel that the idiocy of the general population plays right into such plans by evil entities more than it is caused by them.


     There could be hope for our society. Lippmann's plan for a group of elites running important functions may sound evil and controlling, but it doesn't have to be. If one could find a large group of intelligent people with only the best interests of the public in mind , we might well flourish. However, where Lippmann correctly grasped the public's inability to deal with complex issues, he overestimated humanity's capacity to rule with justice and good will in their hearts. So, with that out as a possible solution, where do we turn? As a young person, I would like to be excited by new technology and it's potential to save mass media and the minds of the citizenry. Since "we cannot be interested in, or much moved by, the things we do not see", satellite television or the power of the Internet can show us so much more than ever (Lippmann). Already though, these brave new frontiers have been perverted by the huge majority of morons in the world. Just look at the most viewed videos on Youtube. Thanks heavens they aren't anything important.   

Works Cited:

Lippmann, Walter. Public Opinion. Fq Classics, 2007. Print.


Sunday, August 28, 2011

I Can't Wait for the Next Twilight Movie!


     This is Donkey Kong Country 2: Diddy Kong's Quest and it has taught me more about bananas, barrels and the evilness of crocodile men than anything else in all of my years. As one of many video games of my youth, it certainly had a hand in shaping my personal life. Yet, it certainly impacted many other lives and quite a few segments of society. Here we arrive at the conclusion that this game and all video games are a part of mass media. Where is the only place to go when one needs a video clip of cats, game-play or random strangers brushing their hair? Yes, Youtube and the Internet where it lives are also forms of mass media. From the newspapers Wall Street executives read to the radio broadcasts sports fans tune in to and to the episodes of iCarly I watch on dvd every night, media can take almost any form. It can be a bit overwhelming to think of just how far-reaching the field of mass media studies can be. It has been with us since ancient times too. Elements of today's comic books "can be found in eighteenth-century prints, which are in turn and adaptation of" even earlier works (Briggs, and Burke). What does it all mean? How does media shape us? Does it control us, entertain us, improve us, harm us or some combination of all of these things and more? My hope is that this course can shed light on these questions and fill the void left by a total lack of media education in any previous level of education. It is shocking that we fail to teach our young people about something we will "spend one third of our lives immersed in", while making sure they are fully aware of all the intricacies of kickball (Sardar, Van, and Appignanesi).
     Many scholars argue that society is slowly headed toward ruin and that media has a large role to play in the downfall. I find it hard to disagree with this school of thought every time I am faced with the latest abomination in the Transformers film franchise or the newest novel written by a moronic reality television star. Plus, without any hint of exaggeration, Twitter, Facebook and social networking of all types will eventually kill all intelligence left on the planet and spit on its grave. However, there is another side to this story. As Hollywood found a formula for successful movies "variation became limited", the whole process became industrialized and profits became more than the GDP of most small countries (Sardar, Van, and Appignanesi). Who can blame them for wanting to make boat loads of currency? Besides, new forms of media and technological advances have made it easier for innovation in movies, books, television and radio to flourish. For every terrible pop song that rots our brains there is a democratic revolution against oppressive regimes organized via new forms of mass media. When viewed from such angles, it is clear that "the implication that trends have moved in a single direction must be rejected" (Briggs, and Burke).
     Personally, I consume far more media than I produce. In the future, the thought of this production vs. consumption comparison will be even more fascinating. Of course, technology will only increase the ability of all people to produce greater amounts of media in all forms, but, in just one instance of consumption, advertising companies will find even more ingenious places to cram their ads and shell their products. Soon, we won't have to answer these and other pressing questions on mass media alone. There will be no need to ponder: are "the consequences of literacy, or television, more or less the same in every society", because we are an increasingly global society (Briggs, and Burke). I can now read a newspaper printed in Moscow. A girl in Finland can listen to here favorite Beastie Boys song on the Internet and be impacted by it. In the year 2218, Donkey Kong Country 127: The Curse of Frank Kong will be an example of media that touches every man, woman and child on the planet.

Works Cited:

Briggs, Asa, and Peter Burke. Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet. Polity Pr,
     2009. Print.

Sardar, Ziauddin, Borin Van, and Richard Appignanesi. Introducing Media Studies. Totem Books, 2006.
     Print.